Скачать 16.24 Mb.
Chapter 1 Water and Plant Cells
Finkelstein, A. (1987) Water Movement through Lipid Bilayers, Pores, and Plasma Membranes: Theory and Reality. Wiley, New York.
Friedman, M. H. (1986) Principles and Models of Biological Transport. Springer, Berlin.
Kramer, P. J., and Boyer, J. S. (1995) Water Relations of Plants and Soils. Academic Press, San Diego.
Milburn, J. A. (1979) Water Flow in Plants. Longman, London.
Nobel, P. S. (1999) Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology. 2nd Edition. Academic Press, San Diego.
Stein, W. D. (1986) Transport and Diffusion across Cell Membranes. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
Chapter 2 Water Balance of Plants
Essay 2.1 A Brief History of the Study of Water Movement in the Xylem
Hanno Richter, University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna, and Pierre Cruiziat, PIAF-INRA-UBP, France
The history of physiology shows many examples of the same debate on how biological systems function, some saying that this functioning is mainly the result of specific properties of the living systems, others affirming that physical laws still play a major role, at least in some aspects. In fact, as we now see more clearly, properties of living cells and physical laws which apply to all living and non living systems continuously interact and cannot be separated. The history of our understanding of sap ascent in plants, and especially in trees, is a beautiful example for this classical debate.
Period of Preparation (Before 1889)
Attempts to explain water transport in plants started with a search for analogies with blood circulation in vertebrates, a physiological process previously elucidated by William Harvey (1628) and Marcello Malpighi (1661). Malpighi, who was also a pioneer in plant anatomy, studied the construction of stem wood and became convinced that vessels (tracheae) served for air transport, while the fibres should transport water. Stephen Hales in 1727 was most likely, the first scientist to show that water in plants is transported unidirectionally from the soil to the transpiring leaves; he could only speculate on the tissues conducting water in the stem. In 1798, the Imperial Academy of Scientists in Erlangen (Germany) organized a prize competition to clear up two questions not yet fully understood at that time:
"1) Which one of the known main parts of a plant (cortex, sapwood, heartwood and pith) is conducting the ascending sap? 2) Is sap descending in the cortex towards the root and into it? And if so, which is the pathway from the interior parts into the cortex?"
Heinrich Cotta, who won the competition, gave the correct answer (sapwood) to the first question and, while not denying the descent of sap in the "cortex" (i.e., the phloem), emphasized the fact that this descending sap contains solutes in high concentration and is therefore different from the sap in the sapwood, so that plant saps do not truly circulate.
Although the transporting tissue became thus finally identified in the 18th and early 19th centuries, the pathway problem lingered on at the microscopic level well into the second half of the 19th century. There were lively disputes on whether the lumen of a conducting xylem element (a tracheid or a trachea) is filled with water, with air or with a sequence of air bubbles interspersed with water (a so-called "Jamin chain"). According to their opinion on this problem, various authors suggested different routes for water ascent. Water was thus assumed to move in the lignified cell walls of air-filled conduits by Unger, Sachs and Pfeffer, or to be transported in the lumen by Boehm, Strasburger and Schwendener, among others. De Candolle and and some followers even credited intercellular spaces with a role in transport.
The anatomical arguments gradually became inseparable from the task of identifying a suitable driving force for water movement. In a way, the idea that living cells should play a major role in lifting and moving the water seemed natural enough; the "vitalists" were however neither able to identify living cells prominently involved in water transport nor to suggest plausible mechanisms for their action. Nevertheless they kept fighting against the "physicists" and their cohesion-tension theory (CTT) well into the 20th century. Great names in plant physiology among the vitalists, such as S. Schwendener and W. Pfeffer, were later followed by A. Ursprung and others as champions in the fight for an essential role of the protoplasm in water ascent. Indeed, even J. Joly and H. H. Dixon, two of the earliest protagonists of the CTT, preserved some "vitalist" convictions for a long time.
|This rich text version does not include all images. For a full version please view the pdf||This rich text version does not include all images. For a full version please view the pdf|
|This rich text version does not include all images. For a full version please view the pdf||Rich Text Version (rtf) – this version of the report has been produced in rtf format and all maps, tables and charts have been removed. A full version is available on this website in pdf format|
|Rich Text Version (rtf) – this version of the report has been produced in rtf format and all maps, tables and charts have been removed. A full version is available on this website in pdf format||This article has been accepted for publication in the Encyclopedia of Human Ecology, Kenneth E. F. Watt, editor. A shorter version is published in the Proceedings of the 17|
|We have placed three stars ( ) at the beginning of each section and article to enable the use of your search features so that you may easily jump from article to article||This is a preprint of an article whose final and definitive form will be published in the Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Please refer to the published version|
|A mathematical Theory of Communication. By C. E. Shannon pdf|
А. В. Болсинов, А. Т. Фоменко. Интегрируемые гамильтоновые системы. Том I. 444 стр. Ижевск 1999. pdf
|Branko Dragovich On p-adic path integral. Pdf|
А. Барут, Р. Рончка Теория представлений групп и её приложения. Т 455 стр., М. Мир, 1980. pdf