NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies




Скачать 340.61 Kb.
НазваниеNeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies
страница9/9
Дата24.09.2012
Размер340.61 Kb.
ТипДокументы
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

5. Bibliography

Ackerman, M.S. "The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility." In John Carroll (ed.), HCI in the New Millennium, Addison-Wesley, 2001.

Alani H. and C. Brewster. Ontology Ranking based on the Analysis of Concept Structures. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Capture ( K-CAP 05), Banff, Canada, ACM, 2005.

van Assem, M., Gangemi, A., and Schreiber, G. Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'06), 2006.

Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.

Behrendt W., Gangemi A., Maass W. and Westenthaler R. Towards an Ontology-Based Distributed Architecture for Paid Content. In Proceedings of The Semantic Web: Research and Applications: Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC, May 29 - June 1, 2005, volume 3532, pages 257–271, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2005. Springer-Verlag GmbH.

Benn, N., Shum, S.B. and Domingue, J. Integrating Scholarly Argumentation, Text and Community: Towards and Ontology and Services. Technical Report KMI-05-5, 2005. (Accepted for 5th International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA) held as part of IJCAI-05 workshop programme, Edinburgh, July-August 2005.)

Berland M. and Charniak E. Finding parts in very large corpora. In Proceedings of ACL'99, 1999.

C. Brewster, H. Alani, S. Dasmahapatra, and Y. Wilks. Data-driven Ontology Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC04), Lisbon, 2004.

Bottazzi E., Catenacci C., Gangemi A. and Lehmann J. From collective intentionality to intentional collectives: an ontological perspective. Cognitive System Research - Special Issue on Cognition and Collective Intentionality, 2006.

Buitelaar P., Eigner T., and Declerck T. OntoSelect: A Dynamic Ontology Library with Support for Ontology Selection. In Proceedings of the Demo Session at the International Semantic Web Conference, Hiroshima, Japan, 2004.

Chandler H.E. The complexity of online groups: a case study of asynchronous collaboration. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 25(1): 17-24, 2001.

Ciaramita M., Gangemi A., Ratsch E., Saric J., and Rojas I. Unsupervised Learning of Semantic Relations between Concepts of a Molecular Biology Ontology. In Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2005.

Cimiano P., Ladwig, G. and Staab, S. Gimme' The Context: Context-driven automatic semantic annotation with C-PANKOW. In Proceedings of the 14th World Wide Web Conference, 2005.

Conklin J., Burgess Yakemovic K.C. A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction (Special Issue on Design Rationale), 6(3&4), pp. 357-391, 1991.

Daelemans W. and Reinberger M.L. Shallow Text Understanding for Ontology Content Evaluation. IEEE Intelligent Systems: 1541-1672, 2004.

Das A., Wand W, and McGuinness D.L.. Industrial Strength Ontology Management. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Working Symposium, 2001.

Ding L., Pan R., Finin T., Joshi A., Peng Y., and Kolari P. Finding and Ranking Knowledge on the Semantic Web. In Y. Gil, E. Motta, V.R. Benjamins, and M.A. Musen, editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference, volume 3729 of LNCS, pp. 156-170, Springer-Verlag, 2005.

Farquhar A., Fikes R., Rice, J. The Ontolingua Server: a Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction, presented at 10th Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Banff, Canada, 1996.

Fernández-López M. and Gómez-Pérez A. The Integration of OntoClean in WebODE. EON2002 Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools. In Proceedings of the OntoWeb-SIG3 Workshop at the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2002), Sigüenza (Spain), 30th September 2002.

Fernández-López M. and Gómez-Pérez A. Searching for a Time Ontology for Semantic Web Applications. In A.C. Varzi and L. Vieu (eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, IOS Press, pp. 331-341, 2004.

Fleck L.. The Problem of Epistemology [1936], in R.S. Cohen and T. Schnelle (eds.), Cognition and Fact - Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 81-2, 1986.

Gamberini L., Spagnolli A., Bua L., Cottone P., Martinelli M. Collaboration in Virtual Environments: The modulated exploitation of other people as resources. Cognition, Technology and Work, 6 (1): 45 – 48, 2004.

Gangemi, A., Pisanelli, D.M., Steve, G.: An overview of the ONIONS project: Applying ontologies to the integration of medical terminologies. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 31: 183–220, 1999.

Gangemi A. and Mika P. Understanding the semantic web through descriptions and situations. In CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE, pages 689–706, 2003.

Gangemi A., Catenacci C., Battaglia M. The Inflammation Ontology Design Pattern: an Exercise in Building a Core Biomedical Ontology with Descriptions and Situations. In Ontologies in Medicine, pages 64–80. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2004a.

Gangemi A., Fisseha F., Keizer J., Pettman I., Taconet M. A Core Ontology of Fishery and its use in the Fishery Ontology Service Project. In A. Gangemi, S. Borgo (eds.): First International Workshop on Core Ontologies, EKAW Conference, published as CEUR-WS proceedings, vol.118, 2004b.

Gangemi, A. Reusing semi-structured terminologies for ontology building: A realistic case study in fishery information systems, Deliverable of the EU FP5 WonderWeb project, available at http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org/deliverables/D16.shtml, 2004c.

Gangemi A., Borgo S., Catenacci C. and Lehmann J. Task Taxonomies for Knowledge Content. Deliverable D07 of the Metokis Project, http://www.loa-cnr.it/Papers/D07 v21a.pdf, 2005a.

Gangemi A., Catenacci C., Ciaramita M., and Lehmann J. Ontology evaluation: A review of methods and an integrated model for the quality diagnostic task. Technical Report, available at http://www.loa-cnr.it/Publications.html, 2005b.

Gangemi A., Catenacci C., Ciaramita M., Lehmann J. Modelling Ontology Evaluation and Validation. In Proceedings of the Third European Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 2006a.

Gangemi A., Catenacci C., Ciaramita M., and Lehmann J. Qood grid. A metaontology-based framework for ontology evaluation and selection. In Proceedings of the EON'2006 Workshop (to appear), available at http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/ws/eon2006/eon2006gangemietal.pdf, 2006b.

Godwin, M. Nine Principles for Making Virtual Communinties Work. Wired, 2.06:72-73, 1994.

Guha, R.: "Open Rating Systems". Technical report, Stanford University, CA. 2003.

Guha, R., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P. and Tomkins, A.: "Propagation of trust and distrust." In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference, New York, NY. ACM Press, pp. 403-412, 2004.

Hahn, U. and Schnattinger, K. Towards text knowledge engineering. In Proc. of 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), Menlo Park, CA, MIT Press, pp. 524-531, 1998.

Hahn, U., Schulz, S. Turning Lead into Gold? Feeding a Formal Knowledge Base with Informal Conceptual Knowledge. In Proceedings of 13th Conference on Knowledge Engineering (EKAW), Springer, Berlin, 2002.

Hepp, M. Products and Services Ontologies: A Methodology for Deriving OWL Ontologies from Industrial Categorization Standards, Int'l Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems (IJSWIS), Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 72-99, 2006.

Karsten H. Collaboration and Collaborative Information Technologies: A Review of the Evidence. DATA BASE 30(2): 44-65, 1999.

Kollock, P. Design Principle for Online Communities. In Proceedings of the Harvard Conference on Internet and Society, 1996.

Lee J., Lai K. What’s in design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction (Special Issue on Design Rationale), 6(3&4), pp. 251–280, 1991.

Lewen, H., Supekar, K., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: "Topic-Specific Trust and Open Rating Systems: An Approach for Ontology Evaluation." In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web (EON2006) at the 15th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2006),Edinburgh, UK. May 2006.

Lopez V., Motta E., and Uren V. PowerAqua: Fishing the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the Third European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC06), 2006.

Louwerse, M.. An Analytic and Cognitive Parametrization of Coherence Relations. Cognitive Linguistics 12(3), pp.291-315, 2001.

Lozano-Tello, A., and Gómez-Pérez, A. ONTOMETRIC: A method to choose the appropriate ontology”. Journal of Database Management, 15(2) , 2004.

Lu, Y. Roadmap for Tool Support for Collaborative Ontology Engineering. Master thesis, XiAn Transportation University, Department of Computer Science, (1994), ©2003, http://www.cs.uvic.ca/~chisel/thesis/YilingLu.pdf.

MacLean A., Young R.M., Bellotti V.M.E. and Moran T.P. Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6: 201-250, 1991.

Maedche, A. and Staab, S. Comparing Ontologies: Similarity Measures and a Comparison Study. Internal Report No. 408, AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, 2001.

Mancini, C and Shum, S.B.. Modelling Discourse in Contested Domains: A Semiotic and Cognitive Framework. Technical Report KMI-06-14, (Final version submitted to International Journal of Human-Computer Studies), 2006.

Mann, W.C. and Thompson S.A.. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organisation. Text 8(3), pp. 243-281, 1988.

Masolo C., Gangemi A., Guarino N., Oltramari A. and Schneider L. WonderWeb EU Project Deliverable D18: The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies. http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org /deliverables/documents/D18.pdf, 2004.

Masolo C., Vieu L., Bottazzi E., Catenacci C., Ferrario R., Gangemi A. and Guarino N. Social roles and their descriptions. In D. Dubois, C. A. Welty, and M.-A. Williams, editors, KR, pages 267–277. AAAI Press, 2004.

Miles, A., Brickley, D. SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification, W3C Working Draft, available at http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-spec/, 2005.

Noy, N.F. Evaluation by Ontology Consumers. IEEE Intelligent Systems: 1541-1672, 2004.

Noy, N.F., Guha, R., Musen, M.A. User ratings of ontologies: Who will rate the raters? In: Proc. of the AAAI 2005 Spring Symposium on Knowledge Collection from Volunteer Contributors, Stanford, CA. 2005.

Noy N.F., Chugh A., Liu W. and Musen M.A. A Framework for Ontology Evolution in Collaborative Environments. In Proceedings of The Semantic Web - ISWC 2006, Springer-LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 544-558, 2006.

Oberle D., Lamparter S., Grimm S., Vrandecic D., Staab S., Gangemi A. Towards Ontologies for Formalizing Modularization and Communication in Large Software Systems. Journal of Applied Ontology, 2006, to appear.

Oberle D., Mika P., Gangemi A., Sabou M. Foundations for service ontologies: Aligning OWL-S to DOLCE. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference (WWW2004), volume Semantic Web Track, 2004.

Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Patel C., Supekar K., Lee Y., and Park E. K.. OntoKhoj: A Semantic Web Portal for Ontology Searching, Ranking and Classification. In Proceeding of the Workshop On Web Information And Data Management, ACM, 2003.

Pisanelli, D.M., Gangemi, A., Steve, G. An Ontological Analysis of the UMLS Metathesaurus. J. of American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 5: 810-814, 1998.

Porzel, R., Baudis, M.. The Tao of CHI: Towards Effective Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004, pp.209-216, 2004a.

Porzel R. and Malaka R. A Task-based Approach for Ontology Evaluation. In Proceedings of ECAI04, 2004b.

Regli W. C., Hu X., Atwood M. and Sun W. A Survey of Design Rationale Systems: Approaches, Representation, Capture and Retrieval. Engineering with Computers, 16, pp. 209–235, 2000.

Sabou M., Lopez V., Motta E., and Uren V. Ontology Selection: Ontology Evaluation on the Real Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the EON'2006 Workshop, collocated with WWW'06, Edinburgh, 2006.

Sanders, T.J.M, Spooren W.P.M., Noordman, L.G.M.. Coherence Relations in a Cognitive Theory of Discourse Representation. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(2), pp.93-133, 1993.

Sereno, B., Shum, S.B. and Motta, E.. Claimspotter: An Environment to support Sensemaking with Knowledge Triples. Technical Report KMI-04-29. (Definitive version published in Proceedings of the Intelligent User Interfaces Conference, IUI2005, San Diego, CA, USA.), 2004.

Shum, S.B. and Hammond, N. Argumentation-Based Design Rationale: What Use at What Cost? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40 (4), 603-652,1994.

Shum, S.B., Motta, E. and Domingue, J.. Augmenting Design Deliberation with Compendium: The Case of Collaborative Ontology Design. Position paper at the Workshop on Facilitating Hypertext Collaborative Modelling in conjunction with ACM Hypertext Conference, Maryland, June 11-12, 2002.

Shum S.B. et al. Co-OPR: Design and Evaluation Collaborative Sensemaking and Planning Tools for Personnel Recovery. Technical Report KMI-06-07, 2006.

Spyns P. EvaLexon: Assessing triples mined from texts. Technical Report 09, STAR Lab, Brussel, 2005.

Stojanovic, L., Stojanovic, N., and Volz, R. Migrating data-intensive web sites into the semantic web, Proceedings of the 17th ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC), ACM Press, pp. 1100-1107, 2002.

Sure Y., Tempich C., Vrandecic D., Pinto S., Paslaru Bontas E. and Hefke M. SEKT Methodology: Initial Framework and Evaluation of Guidelines. Technical Report, Deliverable D7.2.1 of the SEKT project, http://www.sekt-project.org, 2006.

Tempich C. Ontology Engineering and Routing in Distributed Knowledge Management Applications. Phd thesis, University of Karlsruhe, 2006.

Volz, R., Handschuh, S., Staab, S., Studer, R. OntoLiFT Demonstrator, Deliverable of the EU FP5 WonderWeb project, available at http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org/deliverables/D12.shtml, 2004.

Vrandecic D., Sure Y., Tempich C., Engler M. and et al. SEKT Methodology: Initial Lessons Learned and Tool Design. Technical Report, Deliverable D7.2.1 of the SEKT project, http://www.sekt-project.org, 2006.

Welty C. and Guarino N. Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 39(1): 51-74, 2001.

Yao H., Orme A.M., and Etzkorn L. Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application. Journal of Computer Science, 1(1): 107-113, 2005.






1 http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=118&frame=Collaboration&

2 Rational agents are cognitive agents which are able of meta-representations (e.g., typically, human beings with fully developed linguistic capabilities); knowledge collectives are collections of rational agents characterized by some practices of knowledge sharing (cf. [GAN05a]).

Copyright © LOA-ISTC, CNR.


1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

Похожие:

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconThe Use of uml as a Tool for the Formalisation of Standards and the Design of Ontologies in Agriculture

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconEnterprise Architecting Lifecycle Management

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies icon[edit] Primary lifecycle processes

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconNetworked Peers For Business

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconThe importance of trust in the digital networked economy

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconDans – Data Archiving and Networked Services

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconVirtual Collaborative Learning Environments for Music: Networked DrumSteps

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconРуководитель программы: проф. В. А. Иванов Кафедра оптики Научный доц. Ю. Э. Скобло Рецензент: доц. А. А. Пастор Study of the population processes of neon atom

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconHighly versatile Senior System Administrator, skilled in the architectural design and implementation of high-availability systems for all major networked

NeOn: Lifecycle Support for Networked Ontologies iconNew Media is the term used for networked computerized or digital technologies that permeate society. There are many definitions of New Media, depending on the

Разместите кнопку на своём сайте:
Библиотека


База данных защищена авторским правом ©lib.znate.ru 2014
обратиться к администрации
Библиотека
Главная страница