Скачать 4.93 Mb.
|Writing Between the Lines: Revising as "Adding To" Not "Taking Away"|
Use to Write: n/a [the exercise applies to virtually any genre]
Ideas and Concepts revision-as-discovery; “re-envision”. to Explore:
Authors/Works E.M. Forster.
How can I know what I mean until I see what I’ve said?
Maybe you’ve heard that real writers sweat blood when they write, slaving over their texts. Maybe you’ve been told you must be willing to kill off your (text) babies. It is common knowledge that whatever you love best about your writing is the first thing that should go in revision. And yet, we remain of several minds about it.
Though the golden rule here is revise, revise, revise, sometimes we would argue: just don’t do it.
Sometimes revision takes all the best energy out of your writing.
Sometimes writing is better left alone because too often what happens in revision is we try to “fix” our texts according to some vaguely articulated concept of an
ideal—the perfect poem, the shapely story, the moving memoir. If you write with others—a class or writing group—the group will establish the ideal, derived not only from our current writing culture (what gets good reviews or made into movies), but also from the “best” writers in the group. In either case, such “revision” turns into a process of trying to make your writing sound the way it’s “supposed” to sound and soon you lose your way in it.
And sometimes it is better to know when to move on to the next writing project, having already learned from your current one the best of what it has to teach you.
Think of revision not as “fixing,” but as “re-making.”
In most cases we think of revision as an odd kind of writing subtraction in which, if we just take out all the “bad” parts, the writing will say what we mean. Here we propose, instead, a radical logic of addition that depends instead on our not always knowing where we’re headed.
Imagine revision as a wresting apart, a prying open, a writing into the locked spaces of the text in which we may discover something quite beyond our already- known purpose, a wonderful surprise that awaits in the always-writing more.
In this exercise, begin with a text you have written, any kind of writing—a poem, or a story, an autobiographical fragment. Begin by telling yourself you don’t really know what it is about. Now, begin writing between lines of your text. Between every two lines, insert an additional line of writing.
Repeat as before, as many times as necessary, until the writing saturates itself. Variation 1.
Break each sentence in two, completing each as necessary.
Where you have split the sentence, add a sentence between each new sentence. Variation 2.
Identify the basic organizing unit of the text: paragraphs, stanzas, prose fragments. Open the text at the joints of each unit, and write a new one at each break.
To explore and revise your writing according to mixed-genre conventions, add units of different organizing logics. Between paragraphs in prose, insert poem stanzas; between stanzas, insert paragraphs.
Have someone—your teacher, friend, or writing partner—make random slash marks on your text. Then break open the text at each mark and write yourself into that space.
Invent your own variations of revision that proceed from a logic of opening up, adding to, reexploring. Know that revision, too, depends on discovery.
Remain open and interested in the jagged edge of text. Suspect seamlessness. Write on.
'Blowing Up" Your Poems: Large-Font Revision
Use to Write: Poetry
Ideas and Concepts font; stanza, to Explore:
Computer technology has made writing-revision almost miraculously easier than it used to be in what now seems like the Stone Age of handwriting and typewriting. Ironically, however, new drafts of things we write are so easy to produce that we sometimes overlook some additional ways in which the computer can help us revise more rigorously. Here is one of those ways.
Bring an existing draft of a poem up on your monitor. Probably it will be in 10- or 12-point font. “Blow it up” into a huge font—18, 20, 22, 24. Suddenly you will be looking at the poem as if through a magnifying glass; each word will seem massive. Almost automatically, you will find yourself asking, “Is this word really necessary?” or “Can this phrase be tightened?” Also, you’ll discover that if, for example, you have a poem in stanzas of four lines, the large font will force lines to spill over, meaning that in order to preserve the four-line stanzas, you’ll have to shorten each line by removing words or at least replacing words with shorter ones.
But wait a minute: Should a low-grade robot be allowed to force a writer to make cuts simply on the basis of font size?! No. But forcing yourself to say, “I don’t care if this line does spill over—I need every one of those words, and I need those exact words” is a good exercise, a healthy process of revision; call it “defending the words.” It makes you justify each word; it makes you reexamine every move you’ve made in the poem; it asks you to have a reason for being loyal to a certain word or phrase.
Not least of all, magnifying the poem by means of a large font will also generally make you see the poem afresh, whereas even if (or especially if) you’ve taken
the poem through several revisions, you will have seen the text so many times that it becomes a bit of a blur. We tend to memorize our texts.
In sum, then, an aspect of word processing that seems entirely mechanical, graphic, even trivial can be used to achieve a poem that’s more linguistically and intellectually challenging.
Revising Openers in Prose Genres: Eight Options
Use to Write: Short Fiction; Longer Fiction; Creative Nonfiction;
Ideas and Concepts formulaic; personification; riff; voyeurism; to Explore: writer/reader “contract”.
Authors/Works [each of the eight numbered tactics includes a
Mentioned: quotation from a story and identifies the author].
It’s obvious how crucial the first sentence, first few sentences, and/or first paragraph of short stories are. “Openers” begin that precarious contract (always subject to immediate cancellation) between the narrative and the reader. Sometimes as we revise, therefore, it’s good to focus even more than usual on the story’s opener. Here are some “templates,” if you will, for opening up narratives. They are substantially revised versions of ones that appeared in Writer’s Digest (June 1991), pp. 37-39. A list of eight “model” openers may seem a little too cut-and-dried or formulaic, but that’s not the purpose; over the years, looking at such models has helped students first to remember they have available to them more than one way to open for the narrative they’re working on, and second to analyze “openers” they have already crafted. So these eight narrative tactics are not offered as “sure-fire bets” or “quick (and slick) fixes” but as one picture of the range of options open to you. You might choose a story you’re working on and begin by seeing if only one of the options below might work, by improvising upon it, and by seeing what effect it has on the narrative and how the narrative might have to change to accommodate the new opening tactic. Or you might situate the opening sentences of an existing draft among the options. Experiment. (And with some adaptation, some of these tactics may work well with nonfiction writing, too.)
You might call this the “keep it simple” opener: state a conflict or a problem flatly in the first sentence, and as you revise from there, see where the paragraph seems to want to go. This also allows you to ignore, for the moment, that “Show, don’t tell” advice that seems ubiquitous in writing classes. For example, the first sentence of James Purdy’s story, “Cutting Edge,” is:
Mrs. Zeller opposed her son’s beard.
Nothing fancy here! Purdy’s narrator doesn’t “work up” to anything. Sometimes such unadorned bluntness is refreshing—both to you, the writer, and your readers.
In “Everything That Rises Must Converge,” Flannery O’Connor places her reader inside the mind of the main character, Julian, and also quickly suggests the complex relationship he has with his mother:
Fler doctor had told Julian’s mother that she must lose 20 pounds on
account of her blood pressure, so on Wednesday nights Julian had to
take her downtown on the bus for a reducing class at the Y. . . .
Julian did not like to consider all she did for him, but every
Wednesday night he braced himself and took her.
The “problems” suggested here aren’t as out-in-the-open as the “problem” stated in Purdy’s first sentence, but there is a sense in which a variety of pressures are beginning to build. If you’ve read this story, you know how crucial buses and blood pressure become in the plot (I won’t ruin it for those who haven’t read the story), so O’Connor’s opener is also efficient, economical, in the sense of getting to what is, what will be, crucial as the narrative plays out. Maybe you can revise an opener so that it locates itself “inside” a character or represents one character’s view of another.
Here’s how John Updike’s well-known story, “A & P,” begins:
In walks these three girls in nothing but bathing suits.
Hmmm. The “stated problem” isn’t as blunt here as it is in Purdy’s first sentence, but we know something’s up. And we don’t get the psychological quicksand suggested by O’Connor. But we get an appealing blend of character and conflict, for there’s a strong hint of personality, of a voice rattling off a story, and the action described gives us the sense that we’re at least rolling toward a problem, a conflict, a collision of some kind—doesn’t it? What do you think? If you have a first-person story going, you might try something breezy and quick like Updike’s opener and see how it works.
E.B. White starts “The Second Tree From the Corner” this way:
“Ever have any bizarre thoughts?” asked the doctor.
Mr. Trexler failed to catch the word. “What kind?” he said.
Almost regardless of what they’re saying, two-characters-talking has a way of jumpstarting a narrative. Often the effect is one of “beginning in midstream” (in medias res). Maybe it’s that we feel we’re listening in, eavesdropping. I don’t know for sure. Maybe it’s because in virtually every dialogue, every exchange of words, there’s the potential of conflict— misunderstanding, disagreement, overreaction. It could be that “buried”
several paragraphs into your story there’s a dialogue; you could try starting your story there. Give yourself and your reader two voices to listen to.
Often when I read stories or novels that begin by deliberately establishing the setting, I get a little bored—because I want to get to the representations of people, characters, the actors in the drama. There are times, though, when description of setting brings its own drama, as the following opener from Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” does (in my opinion):
The hills across the valley of the Ebro were long and white. On this
side there was no shade and no trees and the station was between
two lines of rails in the sun ....
For me, the extremity, the severe sparseness of the setting, begins to build a tension of its own here. (For similar reasons, I also liked the opening scenes of the so-called “Spaghetti Westerns” of the late 1960s and early 1970s—many featuring Clint Eastwood, many directed by the Italian, Sergio Leone, and most shot, ironically, on the turf of Hemingway’s story, Spain.) And the imagery is striking while not succumbing to the temptation of personifying nature; personification often comes off as forcing the drama, as does a gothic description: You know—thunder, wind in big trees, lightning flashing to reveal the outlines of a big ol’ house. Try opening with setting description, but be a tad sly about it.
This tactic is another daily double, if you will: It starts fairly conventionally, with characters in the drama, but it views them from a distance, as part of the landscape or setting and creates some subtle suspense. The example I’ve chosen is from Alice Adams’ story, “At The Beach”:
The very old couple, of whom everyone at the beach is so highly
aware, seem themselves to notice no one else at all.
The tension here is refreshingly simple, the implicit message being “We watch them but they don’t watch us”—a hint of mystery, a hint of voyeurism, drawing us into the narrative. We like to watch people, don’t we—to spy a little bit? You might capture that feeling in an opener that shares some elements with Adams’.
Desire is ubiquitous in fiction. Sometimes I think, “What else is fiction but narrative expression of what people want but can’t have, what they get but don’t want (while they want for something else), and so forth?” So why not “begin with desire?”—as Walter Howerton does in “The Persistence of Memory”:
Sometimes I wish I had gone to Viet Nam .. .
The first person narrator here wants something, yes, but also he wants something complicated, even counter-to-common-sense: to have fought in a
war, and not just any war but the Viet Nam war. It’s hard not to be interested in this expressed desire and the narrative flowing from it.
Especially after decades of literary criticism that has deflated the importance of, even the very concept of, “theme,” this opener may seem old-fash- ioned, belonging to the age of Jane Austen (Pride and Prejudice begins, “It is a truth universally known that. . .”). For that very reason, however, it can be a refreshing opener because it gives the reader what the reader may least expect—a kind of thesis statement, which is supposed to belong to the domain of essays, not stories. Surprises are good. The example I’ve chosen is from the story, “Widow Water,” by Frederick Busch:
What to know about pain is how little we do to deserve it, how simple it is to give, how hard to lose.
As you revise, try some of these. Experiment with them. Just as importantly, start your own list of openers you like (or don’t like). Take them apart, see how they function, see what narrative moves follow them, improvise, “play riffs.” How to open a narrative is endlessly fascinating, terribly difficult, charmingly challenging, almost always important as you revise and edit.
|Editorial board editor-in-Chief: Asfaw Desta Associate Editor-in-Chief: Derege Kebede||Translator, editor, technical writer, project manager|
Столлингс Вильям. Компьютерные системы передачи данных (Stallings, William. Data and Computer Communications). Moscow: Williams,...
|Associate Editor/Editorial Board Member||Cad special issue on “The Shape of Surfaces 1993 Co-Editor in Chief, Computer Aided Geometric Design|
|The scalability of plant intelligence is regarded as unique within the field of scada systems. By Martin Ahrens, marketing manager Wincc and Holger Oettel||Zum öffnen des Programms Hotel Manager, drücken Sie den "Start" Knopf (in der linken niedrigen Ecke vom Bildschirm), und wählen Sie Programm/Hotel Manager. Sie|
|Перечень статей, опубликованных в журнале “Минеральные ресурсы России. Экономика и управление” в 2010 г. Колонка главного редактора / editor-in-chief’s column орлов В. П|
Аристов В. В., Некрасов А. И. Верхоянская сереброрудная провинция. Перспективы развития и освоения минерально-сырьевой базы
|Name Denise Taylor – Chief Executive Officer June McLoughlin – Board Chairperson Organisation|
|Andrew is editor-in-chief of unix review and coauthor of Practical Algorithms for Programmers (Addison-Wesley, 1995). He can be reached at|
Вообще, когда Вы нуждаетесь в таблице таблице, Вы хотите быструю, удобную хеш-функцию. И если Вы знаете, где взять ее, Вы почти точно...
|A manager’s Guide to Applying Systems Thinking|